Upgrading the Stock on My Savage Apex 110 Hunter XP

seanp

New member
Joined
Jul 2, 2026
Messages
2
I recently decided to replace the factory stock on my Savage Apex 110 Hunter XP after noticing a molding issue that caused the magazine to fit poorly. The original stock required a frustrating amount of effort to get the magazine seated and locked, and it was clear the fit wasn’t quite right. To address the problem, I opted to upgrade to a Hogue OverMold stock.

I purchased the Hogue OverMold stock (model 11101) along with the bottom metal plate (model 041‑109400) from EABCO. Once both parts arrived, the installation process was straightforward. The bottom metal fit snugly into the Hogue stock, and after confirming proper alignment, I dropped the action into the new stock and torqued both the front and rear action screws to 40 inch‑pounds, which is Savage’s recommended specification.

The results were immediately noticeable. The magazine now seats perfectly with no resistance, and the action cycles rounds much more smoothly than it ever did with the original stock. The upgrade not only solved the magazine fitment issue but also improved the overall feel and function of the rifle.

For anyone experiencing similar problems with the factory stock on a Savage 110, the Hogue OverMold has proven to be a solid, worthwhile replacement.
 
I have several Hogue OverMold stocks on rimfire rifles and always liked them.
Never had one on my Centerfire Savages because they are a bit short for me and I need a bit longer pull length from trigger to stock butt to achieve the consistency that results in small group sizes.

Glad to hear you found the right solution for you.
 
How would you evaluate the fore-end flex of the Hogue v. the factory? And which of the two Hogue models did you get ? Hogue store shows two visually identical items on AMAZON : one is heavier and a little higher priced (black) than the other (ghillie green.) I’m leaning to the lighter-weight, green one but want zero fore-end flex.
Thanks!
Cheez
 
I bought the pillar bed stock for mine. As far as the flex is concerned, it flexes, but the clearance between the Hogue stock and the barrel is much better than with the OEM stock. So for me it wasn't an issue. For example, on the OEM stock, I could fit a dollar bill tightly between the barrel and stock. On the Houge, I can fold the bill twice and fit it between the barrel and stock without pinching. The OEM stock did not have any bedding at all. It was just plastic to metal. If flex is your primary concern, you should go with the full-length bedded stock. Keep in mind that if your bottom metal is molded into your OEM stock like mine was, you will need an additional part. The bottom metal plate. Without it, your stock will not hold the magazine, and it will not fit properly into the new stock.


This is what the bottom metal looks like.

Savage-mag-well1-64.jpg
 
I bought a Boyds Laminated stock for my Savage .308. It looked beautiful, but opened my grouping up 3X. I bedded the reciever up to the recoil lug, no difference. I floated the safety tang, no difference. I put the cheap plastic factory stock back on - right back to good groups!!

Come to think of it, wood have given me some sort of problem on almost all of my wood Stock rifles.
 
I bought a Boyds Laminated stock for my Savage .308. It looked beautiful, but opened my grouping up 3X. I bedded the reciever up to the recoil lug, no difference. I floated the safety tang, no difference. I put the cheap plastic factory stock back on - right back to good groups!!

Come to think of it, wood have given me some sort of problem on almost all of my wood Stock rifles.
You are in a minority there. The overwhelming majority who have switched to a properly bedded Boydes Laminate stock, have seen either little to No difference or notable improvement in consistency. However, very few have exhibited WORSE results. And typically, of the few that have, the problem is usually the result of inferior bedding process or the barrel touching the firearm in one or more spots. If the barrel is bedded into the firearm, for instance.
 
I am on my 4th Boyd's stock First one was a Thumbhole Varmint that I didn't like. Just wasn't comfortable. That stock was swapped out for a Spikecamp. Next have been 2 At-One Thumbhole. The 1st one experienced a delamination and Boyd's replaced it. The second one I am using on my bench gun.
 
How would you evaluate the fore-end flex of the Hogue v. the factory? And which of the two Hogue models did you get ? Hogue store shows two visually identical items on AMAZON : one is heavier and a little higher priced (black) than the other (ghillie green.) I’m leaning to the lighter-weight, green one but want zero fore-end flex.
Thanks!
Cheez
Not sure what you by lighter and heavier unless you mean 5 ounces. Options are there for heavy contour and sporter contour. Depends on your barrel. But as for the bedding you have two options. Standard and full length. If you are worried about flex you need to go with the full length. I have one on a Weatherby 223 and a Rem 270. No flex and groups tightened.

1784494852963.webp

I bought a Boyds Laminated stock for my Savage .308. It looked beautiful, but opened my grouping up 3X. I bedded the reciever up to the recoil lug, no difference. I floated the safety tang, no difference. I put the cheap plastic factory stock back on - right back to good groups!!

Come to think of it, wood have given me some sort of problem on almost all of my wood Stock rifles.
Very odd. I couldn't get rid of that cheap flexy OEM stock on my Savage 17 Hornet. I put a Boyds laminate on with no additional fitting. Wasn't needed. That rifle became a laser. It was one of my main predator rifles. I think you may have needed some minor fitting or torqued too heavy or light.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top